U.S. Low Back Pain Guidelines Released
AHCPR Guidelines Recommend Manipulation, Discourage Surgery
WASHINGTON D.C. -- The long awaited low back pain guidelines were
officially released by the United States Agency for Health Care
Policy and Research (AHCPR) at a December 8, 1994 press conference
attended by all of the major media, despite rumors of a surgical
company threatening a lawsuit if the guidelines were released.
For chiropractors, the most important finding of the
multidisciplinary panel was that "manipulation can be helpful for
patients with acute low back problems without radiculopathy when
used within the first month of symptoms." The panel recommended
that if no symptomatic improvement results (i.e., increased
function) after one month of manipulative treatments, manipulation
should be stopped and the patient re-evaluated.
The clinical guidelines were produced by a 23-member panel chaired
by Stanley Bigos, MD. Representing chiropractic were Scott
Haldeman, DC, MD, PhD, and John Triano, MA, DC. The panel also
included: 10 MDs; two members each from the osteopathy, physical
therapy, and nursing professions; two PhDs; an occupational
therapist, and a consumer representative.
The guidelines are restricted in scope to the assessment and
treatment of adults with acute low back problems. Acute is defined
as back pain or discomfort lasting a few days to several weeks. An
episode lasting longer than three months is no longer acute, but
chronic.
The panel made these principal conclusions:
- The initial assessment of patients with acute low back problems
focuses on the detection of "red flags" (indicators of potentially
serious spinal pathology or other nonspinal pathology).
- In the absence of red flags, imaging studies and further testing
of patients are not usually helpful during the first four weeks of
low back symptoms.
- Relief of discomfort can be accomplished most safely with
nonprescription medication and/or spinal manipulation.
- While some activity modification may be necessary during the
acute phase, bed rest longer than four days is not helpful and may
further debilitate the patient.
- Low-stress aerobic activities can be safely started in the first
two weeks of symptoms to help avoid debilitation; exercises to
condition trunk muscles are commonly delayed at least two weeks.
- Patients recovering from acute low back problems are encouraged
to return to work or their normal daily activities as soon as
possible.
- If low back symptoms persist, further evaluation may be
indicated.
- Patients with sciatica may recover more slowly, but further
evaluation can also be safely delayed.
- Within the first three months of low back symptoms, only patients
with evidence of serious spinal pathology or severe, debilitating
symptoms of sciatica, and physiologic evidence of specific nerve
root compromise corroborated on imaging studies can be expected to
benefit from surgery.
- With or without surgery, 80 percent of patients with sciatica
eventually recover.
- Nonphysical factors (i.e., psychological or socioeconomic) may be
addressed in the context of discussing reasonable expectations for
recovery.
According to the AHCPR, the guidelines are "systematically
developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions
about appropriate health care." The guidelines were developed with
a critical and extensive literature review and evaluation of the
empirical evidence. Peer and field review evaluated the validity,
reliability, and utility of the guidelines in clinical practice.
The panel's recommendations are primarily based on the published
scientific literature, and where the scientific literature was
incomplete or inconsistent, the "recommendations reflect the
professional judgment of panel members and consultants."
The need for low back guidelines is clear, with nearly 50 percent
of all working age people experiencing low back symptoms. It is the
most common disability for persons under age 45, and the most
common reason for primary care office visits. Estimates of the cost
of back problems ranges between $20 and $50 billion. The AHCPR
guidelines will likely be considered the highest authority by
third-party payers and the courts.
There is increasing evidence that inappropriate treatment is given
to low back pain sufferers. Rates for surgery and hospitalization
for low back problems vary greatly regionally, and some patients
are more disabled after treatment than before. The guidelines
say surgery is the "most obvious example":
"Despite an extensive medical literature on 'failed back
surgery' and evidence that repeat surgical procedures for low
back problems rarely lead to improved outcome, there are
documented examples of patients who have have had as many 20
spine operations."
The guidelines rate treatment and diagnostic procedures on three different
cost levels: low (under $200); moderate ($200 to $1,000); high (over $1,000).
Panel Ratings
The panel rated available evidence supporting guideline statements
on a grade-scale A to D:
A = Strong research-based evidence (multiple relevant and
high-quality scientific studies).
B = Moderate research-based evidence (one relevant, high-quality
scientific study or multiple adequate scientific studies*).
C = Limited research-based evidence (at least one adequate
scientific study* in patients with low back pain).
D = Panel interpretation of information that did not meet inclusion
criteria as research-based evidence.
- Met minimal formal criteria for scientific methodology and
relevance to population and specific method addressed in guideline
statement.
Summary of Conclusions
The guidelines represent the panel's assessment of a method's potential to achieve
the intended assessment or treatment goals, balanced against its potential
harms and costs. This is a partial summary of the panel's conclusions:
Patient History
- Inquiries about history of cancer, unexplained weight loss,
immunosuppression, intravenous drug use, history of urinary
infection, pain increased by rest, and presence of fever are
recommended to elicit red flags for possible cancer or infection.
Such inquiries are especially important in patients over age 50.
(Strength of Evidence = B)
- Inquiries about signs and symptoms of cauda equina syndrome, such
as a bladder dysfunction and saddle anesthesia in addition to major
limb motor weakness, are recommended to elicit red flags for severe
neurologic risk to the patient. (Strength of Evidence = C)
- Inquiries about history of significant trauma relative to age
(for example, a fall from height or motor vehicle accident in a
young adult or a minor fall or heavy lift in a potentially
osteoporotic or older patient) are recommended to avoid delays in
diagnosing fracture. (Strength of Evidence = C)
- Attention to psychological and socioeconomic problems in the
individual's life is recommended since such nonphysical factors can
complicate both assessment and treatment. (Strength of Evidence =
C)
- Use of instruments such as a pain drawing or visual analog scale
is an option to augment the history. (Strength of Evidence = D)
- Recording the result of straight leg raising (SLR) is recommended
in the assessment of sciatica in young adults. In older patients
with spinal stenosis, SLR may be normal. (Strength of Evidence = B)
- A neurologic examination emphasizing ankle and knee reflexes,
ankle and great toe dorsiflexion strength, and distribution of
sensory complaints is recommended to document the presence of
neurologic deficits. (Strength of Evidence = B)
Spinal Manipulation
- Manipulation can be helpful for patients with acute low back
problems without radiculopathy when used within the first month of
symptoms. (Strength of Evidence = B)
- When findings suggest progressive or severe neurologic deficits,
an appropriate diagnostic assessment to rule out serious neurologic
conditions is indicated before beginning manipulation therapy.
(Strength of Evidence = D)
- There is insufficient evidence to recommend manipulation for
patients with radiculopathy. (Strength of Evidence = C)
- A trial of manipulation in patients without radiculopathy with
symptoms longer than a month is probably safe, but efficacy is
unproven. (Strength of Evidence = C)
- If manipulation has not resulted in symptomatic improvement that
allows increased function after one month of treatments,
manipulation therapy should be stopped and the patient reevaluated.
(Strength of Evidence = D)
Plain X-rays
- Plain x-rays are not recommended for routine evaluation of
patients with acute low back problems within the first month of
symptoms unless a red flag is noted on clinical examination (such
as specified below). (Strength of Evidence = B)
- Plain x-rays of the lumbar spine are recommended for ruling out
fractures in patients with acute low back problems when any of the
following red flags are present: recent significant trauma (any
age), recent mild trauma (patient over age 50), history of
prolonged steroid use, osteoporosis, patient over age 70.
(Strength of Evidence = C)
- Plain x-rays in combination with CBC and ESR may be useful for
ruling out tumor or infection in patients with acute low back
problems when any of the following red flags are present: prior
cancer or recent infection, fever over 100oF, IV drug abuse,
prolonged steroid use, low back pain worse with rest, unexplained
weight loss. (Strength of Evidence = C)
- In the presence of red flags, especially for tumor or infection,
the use of other imaging studies such as bone scan, CT, or MRI may
be clinically indicated even if plain x-rays are negative.
(Strength of Evidence = C)
- The routine use of oblique views on plain lumbar x-rays is not
recommended for adults in light of the increased radiation
exposure. (Strength of Evidence = B)
Physical Agents and Modalities
Under the rubric, "physical agents," a host of interventions (acupuncture, biofeedback,
diathermy, heat, ice, TENS, traction, and ultrasound) were "not recommended"
because of lack of scientific data to support their use. Ice and heat were
suggested to be helpful on a home care basis.
Shoe Insoles and Shoe Lifts
- Shoe insoles may be effective for patients with acute low back
problems who stand for prolonged periods of time. Given the low
cost and low potential for harms, shoe insoles are a treatment
option. (Strength of Evidence = C)
- Shoe lifts are not recommended for treatment of acute low back
problems when lower limb length difference is <2 cm. (Strength of
Evidence = D)
Lumbar Corsets and Back Belts
- Lumbar corsets and support belts have not been proven beneficial
for treating patients with acute low back problems. (Strength of
Evidence = D)
- Lumbar corsets, used preventively, may reduce time lost from work
due to low back problems in individuals required to do frequent
lifting at work. (Strength of Evidence = C)
Traction
Spinal traction is not recommended in the treatment of patients with acute low
back problems. (Strength of Evidence = B)
Acupuncture
Invasive needle acupuncture and other dry needling techniques are not recommended
for treating patients with acute low back problems. (Strength of Evidence
= D)
Thermography
Thermography is not recommended for assessing patients with acute low back problems.
(Strength of Evidence = C)
|