Ever wonder why so many parents are searching for a cure for their child's ear infections? Why don't they get the relief they seek from antibiotics? One possible answer may be the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics for acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media effusion (OME).
A recent issue of Research Activities, published by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), contained the article, "Preventitive antibiotics for middle ear infections have limited benefit." According to the article, "The cost of treating chronic middle ear infections in children in the United States exceeds $3.5 billion a year." Antibiotics are the usual initial course of treatment, but how effective are they?
"Researchers at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and the Harvard School of Public Health, supported in part by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (HS05936), analyzed 27 studies conducted between 1966 and 1993 to determine the efficacy of antibiotics for preventing recurrent AOM and treating OME in children. They found that prophylactic antibiotics do prevent further episodes of AOM, but the magnitude of the effect is limited, with only one in nine children showing an improved outcome.This is yet another example of treating the symptoms rather than the cause. With antibiotics only benefiting 11 percent of the AOM sufferers and only 16 percent of the OME, it is easy to see why parents are searching for a better solution."A short course of antibiotics appears to be effective for OME for short-term clearance of effusion. However, the effect is limited; only one in six patients has an improved outcome, and the improvement only lasts for about 1 month, not enough time to affect speech development. More recent studies suggest that antibiotics offer even fewer short-term benefits, including studies with placebo controls. The researchers note, however, that it may be unreasonable to expect a brief course of antibiotics to produce lasting benefits in this condition, given the continued role of eustachian tube dysfunction involved in the development of OME."
While there is no shortage of projects facing the research community, the need for an effective treatment in pediatric patients is enormous. Perhaps our chiropractic college research departments can be persuaded to make this a priority.
Many relevant diagnostic signs are not performed deliberately by the examiner or by the patient at the examiner’s direction. They are observed as the patient reacts to their condition. Fortin’s finger sign, Minor’s sign, and Vanzetti’s sign are three examples of this principle.
Spearheaded by burgeoning scientific and clinical research literature, psychedelics have reached a level of media coverage and popular interest that has not been seen for over half a century. By “psychedelics,” we are referring to the unique class of substances that includes psilocybin (the active compound found in so-called “magic mushrooms”), LSD, dimethyltryptamine (DMT), ayahuasca, 5-MeO-DMT, and mescaline – each of which occurs in the natural world (except for LSD, which is a semi-synthetic compound).
While working at the Lovelace Medical Center in Albuquerque, N.M., one of the primary care physicians stated that imaging every patient prior to receiving chiropractic was not medically necessary. It was at that point I reconsidered the need for the imaging of every patient to avoid malpractice.
