







| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LoSRICs: Epidemiological AnalysisBy Arthur Croft, DC, MS, MPH, FACO How many people are injured each year in relatively low-speed rear impact collisions (LoSRICs)? You know the kind I am referring to -- the kind that the auto insurers and their medicolegal lackeys claim cannot produce injuries lasting more than a few weeks.I've just finished writing the chapter on epidemiology in my forthcoming book, Understanding Low Speed Rear Impact Collisions. I thought the readers of DC might be interested in the very latest statistics on whiplash injuries, particularly since we have been bombarded this year with bad science: first the RAND-sponsored report on the high incidence of fraud in personal injury; then the "Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining 'whiplash' and its management." I have previously addressed the RAND-sponsored and QTF reports in "DC" earlier this year. The report sponsored by RAND was seriously flawed. The QTF report is problematic in a number of ways. I address these in more detail my new book. However the QTF clearly did not "redefine whiplash" nor did they give us anything tangible in terms of management. I reviewed data from a number of government sources, including the National Accident Sampling System; General Estimates System; Crashworthiness Data System; Fatal Accident Reporting System; National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration's special report on whiplash; National Safety Council; U.S. Public Health Service, and the Federal Highway Administration. From this data I have derived what I believe are the most accurate current figures for the incidence of whiplash (actual number of new injuries each year) and the prevalence of chronic residuals from whiplash injuries in the U.S. population. I did this several years ago, but it is such a tremendous headache that I resisted doing it again until just recently. The following is an excerpt from the summary section of chapter one of my new book: SummaryNASS/CDS
You should not be confused by the seeming ambiguity of these figures. They are the results of different government estimating systems, designed to assess the extent of the problem. They don't always agree with each other. Only by carefully analyzing all of these data, can we derive an accurate set of values for incidence and prevalence. In the interest of parsimony, I've omitted the calculations. However, I have calculated that there are two million rear impact accident related injuries in the U.S. each year, giving us an incidence of 770/100,000. These accidents account for 38.7 percent of all motor vehicle accident injuries. Based on my calculations, the various estimating systems currently in place may be underestimating the problem of whiplash by more than 40 percent. Most rear impact collisions occur during daylight hours; most happen during rush hour traffic, on straight, flat, dry sections of road. Driver inattention and recognition delays has been cited as the leading cause of rear impact collision (93 percent). Younger persons are more frequently involved as the drivers of the striking vehicle, with males and females equally represented in this role. However, females are significantly overrepresented in the struck driver role for reasons not entirely clear to me at this point. Outcome/prognostic studies suggest that from 12 percent to 86 percent of whiplash victims will continue to be symptomatic for years after the injury. (Again, in the interest of brevity I've omitted much of these derivations.) Rear impact injuries have a worse prognosis than side or frontal impact injuries. On average about 46 percent of the patients in these studies had not recovered completely at follow-up -- about 10 percent rating their problems as disabling or severe. Using these outcome studies, in conjunction with the incidence figure derived earlier, I estimated the following prevalence figures: a. Assuming a conservative 25 percent nonresolution of symptoms; after 25 cumulative years of whiplash, the prevalence of chronic pain in the U.S. would be 6,731/100,000, or 6.7 percent of the population. b. Assuming 50 percent nonresolution of symptoms, after 25 cumulative years of whiplash; the prevalence of chronic pain in the U.S. would be a remarkable 9,615/100,000, or 9.6 percent of the population. LoSRICs comprise a large proportion of all rear impact collision injuries. Most modern passenger vehicles can withstand crash speeds of up to eight or nine mph, and sometimes higher, without sustaining visible damage. The reported threshold for soft tissue injury of the neck in healthy adult males is five mph. Therefore, modern passenger vehicles can crash at nearly twice this injury threshold, yet appear undamaged. There is no scientific basis for estimating or calculating the probability of soft tissue injury to the occupants of vehicles based on property damage to the vehicles. Finally, there are three ways that we can attempt to reduce the size of the problem: a. Reduce the number of collisions through high technology crash avoidance countermeasures, such as the Intelligent Vehicle Highway System currently under research. b. Make all passenger vehicles more crashworthy through the use of improved restraint systems, improved head restraints and seat backs, and enhanced bumper designs. c. Improve treatment and management strategies through physician continuing education, particularly targeting portal of entry practitioners, such as emergency room physicians. Arthur C. Croft Click here for more information about Arthur Croft, DC, MS, MPH, FACO.
Adobe Creative Suite 4 Master Collection Buy |
|
||||||
|
To report inappropriate ads, |
|
|
|
Chiropractic Mailing Lists | Chiropractic Industry News | Classified Advertising | DC News Update Newsletter Discussion Forums | Event Calendar | For Chiropractic Students | Link to Us | Meet the Staff Other Sources | Previous Issues | Research Review Newsletter | Site Map | Webcasts [ Home ] [ Contact Us ]
Other MPA Media Sites:
Policies: |
|
All Rights Reserved, Dynamic Chiropractic, 2009.
|