Creating Chiropractic Community Meet The Staff About Us Site Map Contact Us
ChiroWeb Logo Discussion Forums ChiroPoll Webcasts Subscribe Advertising Information
Dynamic Chiropractic
June 19, 1995, Volume 13, Issue 13

Printer Friendly Version
E-mail to a Friend

Search ChiroWeb!

Extended Search

Chiro Directory
Event Calendar
Previous Issues
Editorial Schedule
Member Services
Classified Advertising
Chiropractor Web Sites
Industry News

Quebec Task Force Rewrites Whiplash Protocols

Validation for Efficacy of Treatment Sadly Lacking

"Neck pain is to the automobile what low back pain is to the workplace."

The health costs of whiplash-associated disorders (WADs), while not as high as the cost of low back pain, affects over 120,000 Americans each year. North of the border, the province of Quebec in 1987 payed out over $18 million Canadian health care dollars for whiplash injuries. That significant expenditure moved the Quebec Automobile Insurance Society to fund a major study on whiplash-associated disorders.

The Society approached Walter Spitzer, MD, MPH, FRCPC, professor of medicine at McGill University, to gather an international team of whiplash experts. Dr. Spitzer formed the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash Associated Disorders, an 18-member group that included chiropractic researcher J. David Cassidy, DC, PhD, FCCSC. Their monogram was published in the April 15, 1995 supplement of the Spine journal (to order a copy, call 800-638-3030).

The literature review was particularly rigorous, lasting nearly two years and encompassing 10,382 research papers on the treatment of whiplash. Of the 10,382 studies only 1,204 met the preliminary screening criteria, many because they were case histories without any validation of treatment efficacy. From there, the panel whittled down the studies to a select core group of 294. These studies were then rated for relevance and scientific merit. Only 62 of the 294 (21 percent) made the final cut and were deemed acceptable to the task force. This lack of acceptable research would ultimately leave many forms of whiplash treatment without any evidence of efficacy.

One of the most important developments to come out of the work of the task force is a classification system for WAD complaints. This ultimately facilitates better application of treatment based upon clinical findings.

Proposed Clinical Classifications
of Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD)

0   No complaint about the neck -- No physical sign(s)

I   Neck complaint of pain, stiffness or tenderness only -- No
physical sign(s)

II  Neck complaint and musculoskeletal sign(s)
III Neck complaint and neurological sign(s)

IV Neck complaint and fracture or dislocation

Most current whiplash treatments were deemed lacking scientific validation: ....>..............|...................|...........................

"Most therapeutic interventions currently used in patients with WAD have not been evaluated in a scientifically rigorous manner. These unproven therapies include cervical pillows, postural alignment training, acupuncture, spray and stretch, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, ultrasound, laser, short-wave diathermy, heat, ice, massage, epidural or intrathecal injections, muscle relaxants, and psychosocial interventions."

The evidence of efficacy of whiplash treatments is meager:

Manipulation, coupled with other treatment(s) and time limitations, was recognized as effective:

For the chiropractic profession, the task force findings may not be surprising. The consensus recommendation for short-term spinal manipulation was based on two studies and specified:

The authors of the two studies recommend that more randomized controlled trials be conducted to "assess the short and long-term regimen of manipulative therapy."


Collars No research. No more than 72 hours.

Bed Rest           No research.        No more than 4 days.

Cervical Pillows   No research.        Not required.


Manipulation Two studies. Short regimen can be used.

Mobilization       Combined studies.   Regimen can be used.

Exercise           Combined studies.   Range of motions exercises

Postural Advice    Combined studies.   Can be given.

Spray & Stretch    No research.        Not recommended.

Traction           Combined studies.   Regimen can be combined with


TENS No research. Optional activation adjunct.

PEMT               Two studies.        Not recommended.

Electrical Stimulation, Ultrasound, Laser, Short Wave Diathermy, Heat, Ice, Massage

No Research.        Optional activation


Surgery            No research.        Very restricted use.


Steroid Injections One study. Not recommended except epidural.

Sterile Water Injections

One study.          Optional adjunct to


Narcotic Analgesics

No Research.        Not recommended.


No research.        Not Recommended.

Analgesics or NSAIDS

Combined studies.   Up to 3 weeks for pain.
(formally prescribed)

Prescribed Function (neck school, work alternatives, relaxation techniques)

One study.          Recommended.

Acupuncture        One study.          Not recommended.
(not formally prescribed)

Magnetic Necklace  One study.          Not recommended.

Dynamic Chiropractic
June 19, 1995, Volume 13, Issue 13

Printer Friendly Version
E-mail to a Friend

To report inappropriate ads,