To any clinician who treats injured workers, one of the most important questions is at what point and under what circumstances should the patient be returned to the job.
A patient returned to work too early may risk further injury or exacerbate the primary condition. However, a delayed return to work (RTW) may cause a variety of problems. With increasing time off work, the patient may become progressively deconditioned, and the likelihood of disability increases. Moreover, if the recover period is too extensive, the patient may not have a job to return to. The safe and expeditious RTW is not adequately addressed in most clinical training programs
After graduating from chiropractic college nearly 20 years ago, I still remember my first injured worker, a laborer at a warehouse who presented with a low back injury. I was very sympathetic and suggested that he take a few days off from his job. By the end of the week he was feeling much better and in my opinion was ready to return to work. When he asked me for a light duty prescription, I confidently pulled out a prescription pad that read "return to regular/light duty." I circled light duty, then in the space provided on the pad wrote, "restricted to lifting 20 pounds." I signed the official looking form and proudly gave it to my patient. He place the document in his wallet and scheduled his next appointment.
Whether or not restricting his lifting to an arbitrary 20 pounds actually helped I do not know. How was I to know what he could and could not do? Would it have been better to restrict him to five pounds or perhaps to no lifting at all? Did he actually need any type of work restrictions? What exactly does light duty mean, after all I continued to use the same form for several years and no one ever questioned it.
The practice of placing injured workers on any type of work or activity restriction should be based on some defined parameters. These should include an understanding of the nature of the injury, the characteristics of the individual, and the demands of the job to which the patient is to return. This may only be arrived at after a thorough examination of both the patient and the job. The following areas should be considered.
A second RTW policy leaves the entire decision in the hands of the clinician. The company states that RTW may only take place when the doctor provides a complete release and return to regular duties. Light duty is nonexistent. The injured worker may return on an all or nothing basis. While the rationale for such a policy is easily understood, once again the outcome is often less than desirable. With the addition of the recent Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), such a policy may actually be illegal. The ADA states: "No covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual with a disability ... providing the individual can perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodation." The employer who will not allow an injured worker with a temporary disability to return to work until they are fully recovered is actually in defiance of the ADA. It is mandated that each employer provide reasonable accommodation to enable individuals to accomplish the essential functions of the job. This may include assistive devices, job rotation, job modification, etc.
Contrary to popular practice, every effort should be made to allow injured workers to return to work as quickly and safely as possible. Workers should be encouraged to remain on the job and employers should be encouraged to provide necessary accommodations for injured workers. Clinicians should work closely with human resource personnel to determine the most appropriate course of action. In these days of skyrocketing health care costs, it makes clinical and economic sense to keep people on the job whenever possible.
Paul Hooper, DC
Diamond Bar, California
Many relevant diagnostic signs are not performed deliberately by the examiner or by the patient at the examiner’s direction. They are observed as the patient reacts to their condition. Fortin’s finger sign, Minor’s sign, and Vanzetti’s sign are three examples of this principle.
Spearheaded by burgeoning scientific and clinical research literature, psychedelics have reached a level of media coverage and popular interest that has not been seen for over half a century. By “psychedelics,” we are referring to the unique class of substances that includes psilocybin (the active compound found in so-called “magic mushrooms”), LSD, dimethyltryptamine (DMT), ayahuasca, 5-MeO-DMT, and mescaline – each of which occurs in the natural world (except for LSD, which is a semi-synthetic compound).
While working at the Lovelace Medical Center in Albuquerque, N.M., one of the primary care physicians stated that imaging every patient prior to receiving chiropractic was not medically necessary. It was at that point I reconsidered the need for the imaging of every patient to avoid malpractice.
